SLS: Selective Laser Sintering

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) stands out as a groundbreaking technology that has revolutionized the way we conceive and fabricate products. Nestled within the broader spectrum of additive manufacturing, SLS has carved its niche by offering unparalleled precision and versatility, especially in the realm of 3D technology.

At its core, SLS is a sophisticated method that uses a high-precision laser to fuse small particles of polymer, typically nylon, layer by layer, to create complex geometries that were once considered unachievable. This process not only opens the door to rapid prototyping but also transcends traditional manufacturing limitations, enabling the creation of parts and prototypes directly from digital 3D models. The implications of this are profound, as it dramatically shortens development cycles and allows for quick modeling and prototype development.

The versatility of SLS lies in its compatibility with a diverse range of printing materials. Primarily utilizing thermoplastic polymers, it offers designers and engineers the flexibility to experiment with various properties – from rigidity to flexibility, depending on the application’s requirements. This adaptability makes SLS an invaluable tool in industries that constantly push the boundaries of design and functionality.

As we peer into the capabilities and applications of SLS, it’s crucial to understand its foundational elements – from the intricate laser sintering process to the granular form of the polymers used. These elements work in concert to turn conceptual 3D designs into tangible, high-quality products, marking a significant leap in the realm of small-scale production and custom manufacturing.

As you will see, Selective Laser Sintering emerges as a symbol of technological advancement in additive manufacturing. Its ability to transform digital blueprints into physical realities quickly and accurately represents a remarkable stride in the ongoing journey of manufacturing innovation.

Laser, Powder, Action! The Evolutionary Saga of Selective Laser Sintering

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), a cornerstone in the field of additive manufacturing, has a rich history marked by innovation and technological breakthroughs. The journey of SLS began in the mid-1980s, a period marked by rapid advancements in 3D printing technologies. Dr. Carl Deckard, a student at the University of Texas, along with his professor, Dr. Joe Beaman, were pivotal in developing the SLS process, initially aiming to create a method that could efficiently produce small and complex parts.

The first patent for SLS was filed in 1986, marking the official birth of a technology that would revolutionize manufacturing. The early SLS machines were rudimentary, yet they laid the foundation for a process that could create objects layer by layer by sintering powdered material using a laser beam. These machines introduced a new realm of possibilities in manufacturing, particularly in creating parts and prototypes that were too intricate for traditional methods.

Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, SLS underwent significant advancements. The introduction of more robust and reliable laser systems enhanced the precision and quality of the sintering process. During this period, the range of materials compatible with SLS expanded beyond polymers to include metals, ceramics, and composites, broadening the scope of its applications.

The turn of the millennium witnessed SLS technology becoming more refined and accessible. Innovations in laser technology, improved material handling systems, and enhanced software algorithms contributed to higher accuracy, better surface finish, and increased production speed. These improvements were pivotal in transitioning SLS from a prototyping tool to a viable option for small-scale production and custom manufacturing.

In the past decade, the focus shifted towards making SLS more user-friendly and cost-effective. The development of compact, benchtop SLS printers made the technology accessible to smaller businesses and educational institutions, which previously could not afford the larger, industrial-grade machines. This democratization of SLS technology opened up new avenues for innovation and creativity across various sectors.

Today, SLS stands as a mature technology known for its versatility, precision, and ability to produce strong, functional parts. It continues to evolve, with ongoing research and development aimed at expanding material capabilities, increasing printing speed, and reducing operational costs. The history of SLS is not just a record of technological advancement but a testament to the transformative power of additive manufacturing in shaping the future of production and design.

Who were the pioneers behind the development of Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)?

Dr. Carl Deckard and Dr. Joe Beaman at the University of Texas were the pioneers of SLS, developing the initial concept and process in the mid-1980s.

How did SLS technology evolve in terms of materials used?

Initially, SLS technology mainly used polymers, but over time it evolved to include a wide range of materials including metals, ceramics, and composites, significantly broadening its application scope.

What marked the shift of SLS from being a prototyping tool to a viable production method?

Key advancements in the early 2000s, like enhanced laser systems, improved material handling, and sophisticated software algorithms, led to increased accuracy and production speed. These improvements helped transition SLS from a prototyping tool to a practical option for small-scale production and custom manufacturing.

From Powder to Precision with Laser Power

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) is a sophisticated additive manufacturing process that has revolutionized the way we approach 3D printing and prototyping. At its heart lies the intricate interplay of laser technology and polymer science, which together fabricate complex parts with remarkable precision and strength. Understanding the SLS process involves delving into its core elements: laser technology, polymer sintering, and the layer foundation process.

Laser Technology in SLS: SLS employs a high-precision laser, commonly a CO2 laser, as its primary tool. This powerful laser precisely traces and fuses powdered material based on a 3D model’s digital cross-sections. As the laser moves across the powder bed, it selectively sinters – or fuses – the tiny polymer granules, transforming them from a powdered form into a solid structure. This meticulous process is controlled by advanced software, allowing for the creation of parts with complex geometries that would be challenging, if not impossible, to achieve using traditional manufacturing methods.

Polymer Sintering Process: The term ‘sintering’ refers to the process of forming a solid mass of material without melting it to the point of liquefaction. In SLS, this involves the use of thermoplastic polymer powders, such as Nylon 12 or Polyamide 12 (PA 12), known for their durability and versatility. The laser selectively heats these powders just below or at their melting point, causing the particles to bond at a molecular level. The sintering process ensures uniform strength and balanced properties throughout the part, contributing to the high functional quality of SLS-printed objects.

Layer Foundation and the Printing Base: The SLS process begins with a thin layer of polymer powder being spread across the printing base or the build platform. After each pass of the laser, the build platform lowers, and a new powder layer is applied. This layer-by-layer approach continues until the part is fully constructed. The unsintered powder surrounding each layer serves a dual purpose – it acts as a support structure for overhanging and complex features and can be reused for subsequent prints, making SLS an efficient and environmentally friendly manufacturing option.

The entire SLS process showcases a remarkable blend of precision, efficiency, and flexibility, making it a favored choice in industries ranging from aerospace to medical device manufacturing. Its ability to transform digital designs into functional, high-quality parts quickly and effectively has cemented its position as a cornerstone in the realm of modern additive manufacturing.

What role does laser technology play in Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)?

In SLS, a high-precision laser, typically a CO2 laser, is the core tool that selectively fuses powdered material based on the 3D model’s design. This laser accurately traces and sinters polymer granules, enabling the creation of complex and detailed parts.

How does the polymer sintering process work in SLS?

Sintering in SLS involves heating thermoplastic polymer powders to just below or at their melting point without fully liquefying them. This process causes the particles to bond at a molecular level, forming a solid mass with uniform strength and balanced properties, crucial for the functionality and durability of the printed parts.

Can you describe the layer foundation process in SLS?

The SLS process builds parts layer by layer. It starts with spreading a thin layer of polymer powder on the build platform. After each laser pass, the platform lowers, and a new layer of powder is applied. This continues until the entire part is constructed, with unsintered powder providing support for complex structures and being reusable for future prints.

Nylon and Beyond: Exploring the Building Blocks of SLS

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) is a highly versatile additive manufacturing process, largely due to its compatibility with a wide range of materials, each offering distinct characteristics and advantages. The core materials used in SLS are thermoplastic polymers, among which nylon powder, particularly Nylon 12, stands out for its robustness and versatility.

Thermoplastic Polymers in SLS: Thermoplastic polymers are the backbone of SLS printing. These materials are well-suited for SLS due to their ability to soften when heated and solidify upon cooling, allowing for precise layer-by-layer construction. The thermoplastics used in SLS are granular in form, facilitating even spreading and consistent sintering by the laser. The most widely used thermoplastic in SLS is Nylon, known for its strength, durability, and flexibility.

Nylon Powder – The SLS Staple: Nylon powder, particularly Nylon 12 (PA 12), is renowned in SLS printing for its excellent mechanical properties. It offers a unique combination of strength, flexibility, and resistance to chemicals and abrasion. Nylon 12 is also known for its low moisture absorption, ensuring stability and longevity in various environmental conditions. These properties make it an ideal choice for functional parts and prototypes that require durability and high-quality finish.

Characteristics of SLS Materials: The properties of materials used in SLS directly impact the functionality and application of the printed parts. Some common characteristics evaluated include tensile strength, elongation at break, heat deflection temperature, and surface finish. These properties determine the suitability of materials for different applications, from industrial components to consumer goods.

Comparison of Common SLS Materials

Material	Tensile Strength	Elongation at Break	Heat Deflection Temperature	Applications
Nylon 12	High	Moderate	High	Functional parts, complex assemblies
PA 12	Moderate	High	Moderate	Flexible components, prototypes
Other Polymers	Varies	Varies	Varies	Dependent on specific properties

The choice of material in SLS printing is crucial as it defines the part’s performance, appearance, and longevity. With continuous advancements in material science, the range of SLS-compatible materials is expanding, paving the way for new applications and innovations in additive manufacturing.

What makes thermoplastic polymers ideal for SLS?

Thermoplastic polymers are ideal for SLS due to their ability to soften when heated and solidify upon cooling, allowing for precise construction layer by layer. Their granular form facilitates even spreading and consistent sintering, making them versatile for various printing needs.

Why is Nylon 12 considered a staple material in SLS printing?

Nylon 12 is favored in SLS printing for its excellent balance of strength, flexibility, and chemical and abrasion resistance. Its low moisture absorption ensures stability and durability in various environments, making it ideal for functional parts that require longevity and a high-quality finish.

How do the properties of SLS materials influence their applications?

The properties of SLS materials, such as tensile strength, elasticity, and heat resistance, play a crucial role in determining their suitability for different applications. For instance, materials with high tensile strength and moderate elasticity like Nylon 12 are perfect for functional parts, while those with higher flexibility may be used for prototypes or components requiring adaptability.

Precision Battle: SLS Takes on SLA and FDM in 3D Printing Arena

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) stands as a prominent technology in the world of 3D printing, but it’s just one of many methodologies that have revolutionized rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Understanding how SLS compares to other significant 3D printing technologies, such as Stereolithography (SLA) and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), is crucial to grasp its unique place in the additive manufacturing landscape.

SLS vs. Stereolithography (SLA): SLS and SLA differ primarily in their approach to layer formation and material use. While SLS uses a laser to sinter powdered material, SLA employs a laser or other light source to cure liquid resin. SLA is renowned for its exceptional surface finish and high-resolution details but is limited in terms of material variety and functional strength compared to SLS. SLS, on the other hand, excels in producing durable, functional parts and allows for more material diversity, including various polymers and metals.

SLS vs. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): FDM, one of the most widely accessible 3D printing technologies, works by extruding thermoplastic filaments through a heated nozzle, layer by layer. While FDM is more cost-effective and straightforward in terms of operation, it often falls short in precision and strength compared to SLS. SLS parts exhibit superior mechanical properties and are ideal for complex, functional prototypes and end-use parts due to their isotropic nature and material properties.

Material Uniformity and Precision: One of the key advantages of SLS over other technologies is its material uniformity and consistent quality across parts. SLS parts are known for their isotropic mechanical properties, meaning they have uniform strength and behavior in all directions. SLA and FDM, while capable of high accuracy, often exhibit anisotropic properties, leading to variations in strength depending on the orientation of the print layers.

Application Areas: SLS finds its niche in applications where part functionality and strength are paramount. It’s widely used for complex, durable parts in industries like aerospace, automotive, and medical devices. SLA, with its fine details and smooth surface finish, is often preferred for models, prototypes, and parts where aesthetics are crucial. FDM, being the most accessible and cost-effective, is commonly used for basic prototypes, educational models, and simple functional parts.

How does SLS compare to SLA in terms of final part quality?

While SLA excels in producing parts with fine details and smooth surface finishes, SLS is superior in creating parts with uniform strength and functional durability. SLS also offers greater material diversity, making it more suitable for complex, functional prototypes and end-use parts.

What are the primary differences between SLS and FDM printing technologies?

FDM is known for its cost-effectiveness and simplicity, using thermoplastic filaments to create parts. However, SLS offers superior precision and strength, producing isotropic parts with uniform mechanical properties. FDM parts often show layer lines and have anisotropic properties, which can lead to variations in strength based on the print orientation.

In what applications is SLS considered more advantageous than SLA and FDM?

SLS is particularly advantageous in applications requiring high functional strength, durability, and complex geometries. It’s widely used in industries like aerospace, automotive, and medical devices for producing robust, durable parts. On the other hand, SLA is preferred for aesthetic models and prototypes, while FDM is ideal for basic prototypes and educational models due to its accessibility and ease of use.

SLS: A Closer Look at the Strengths and Shortcomings in 3D Laser Printing

Like any technology, laser printing comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages, which are crucial for users to understand when choosing the right 3D printing method.

Advantages of SLS:

Complex Geometries and Design Freedom: One of the most significant benefits of SLS is its ability to create complex and intricate designs that are often impossible with traditional manufacturing methods. This includes internal features, interlocking parts, and complex geometries without the need for additional support structures.
Strong, Durable Parts: SLS parts are known for their strength and durability. The sintering process ensures uniform mechanical properties, resulting in parts that are robust and suitable for functional use.
Material Efficiency: SLS is an efficient process in terms of material usage. The unsintered powder can be reused, reducing waste and making it a cost-effective solution for many applications.
Wide Range of Materials: SLS supports a variety of materials, including diverse polymers and metals. This versatility allows for numerous applications across different industries.

Disadvantages of SLS:

Surface Finish: While SLS parts are strong and functional, they may lack the smooth surface finish found in other 3D printing methods like SLA. This can be a drawback for applications where aesthetic quality is paramount.
Cost and Accessibility: High-quality SLS printers are typically more expensive than other 3D printers, like FDM, making them less accessible for small businesses or individual users.
Limited Color and Finishing Options: SLS parts are usually limited in color, typically white or grey, and may require additional post-processing for aesthetic purposes.
Size Limitations: The build size of SLS machines can be a limitation for producing large parts, requiring them to be printed in sections and assembled post-production.

Advantages and Challenges of SLS

Pros	Cons
Complex design capabilities	Rougher surface finish compared to SLA
Strong, durable parts	Higher cost and lower accessibility
Material efficiency with powder reuse	Limited color and finishing options
Wide range of materials	Size limitations for large parts

What makes SLS standout in terms of design capabilities?

SLS’s ability to create complex geometries and intricate designs without the need for support structures sets it apart. It can produce internal features, interlocking parts, and complex shapes that are often challenging or impossible with traditional manufacturing.

How does the surface finish of SLS parts compare to other 3D printing methods?

SLS parts typically have a rougher surface finish compared to methods like SLA. While they are strong and functional, the surface might not be as smooth or aesthetically refined, making additional post-processing necessary for applications where surface appearance is crucial.

Are there any material-related limitations in SLS printing?

One limitation of SLS printing is the relatively limited color options, as parts are usually white or grey. This can be a drawback for projects requiring a variety of colors or specific aesthetic qualities. However, post-processing techniques can be employed to enhance the appearance and color of the final parts.

SLS Takes Flight: Revolutionizing Aerospace, Medical, and Automotive Industries

SLS has made a significant impact across various industries, offering unparalleled flexibility, precision, and strength in additive manufacturing. Its ability to produce complex, durable parts quickly and efficiently has made it a go-to choice in sectors such as aerospace, medical, and automotive. Each industry leverages SLS’s unique capabilities to meet specific needs and challenges.

1. Aerospace Industry:

In aerospace, selective laser sintering is utilized for its ability to create lightweight yet strong components, crucial for optimizing fuel efficiency and performance in aircraft. Components like air ducts, wall panels, and even critical parts like engine components are often manufactured using SLS.
A notable application is the production of satellite components. The intricate geometries and lightweight demands of these parts make SLS an ideal choice. The technology allows for the creation of parts that would be nearly impossible or prohibitively expensive to manufacture traditionally.

2. Medical Industry:

The medical sector benefits immensely from SLS in creating custom, patient-specific items. Prosthetics, orthopedic implants, and surgical guides tailored to individual patients are common SLS products.
SLS is also instrumental in producing complex medical devices and equipment. For instance, it’s used to create components for handheld diagnostic devices, where precision and reliability are paramount.

3. Automotive Industry:

Automotive manufacturers leverage SLS for both prototyping and production. Components like dashboard elements, ventilation systems, and even end-use parts are created using SLS, significantly reducing development time and cost.
A key application in this sector is the creation of custom jigs and fixtures for assembly lines. SLS’s ability to produce these tools quickly and cost-effectively allows for more efficient and adaptable manufacturing processes.

Across these industries, SLS stands out for its ability to handle high-complexity designs and produce parts with excellent mechanical properties. Its versatility in material choice, including polymers and metals, further broadens its applicability. From creating prototypes that accelerate product development to manufacturing end-use parts, SLS continues to be a transformative force in modern manufacturing, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in design and production.

How has SLS transformed the aerospace industry?

SLS has revolutionized the aerospace industry by enabling the production of lightweight, strong components essential for fuel efficiency and performance. It allows for the creation of intricate parts like air ducts and satellite components, which are crucial for the advanced functioning of aircraft and spacecraft.

What role does SLS play in the medical field?

In the medical field, SLS is pivotal in creating patient-specific items such as prosthetics, orthopedic implants, and surgical guides, tailored for individual needs. Its precision also facilitates the production of complex medical devices, ensuring reliability and accuracy in critical healthcare applications.

Can you provide examples of SLS applications in the automotive industry?

In the automotive sector, SLS is widely used for both prototyping and production. It’s employed in making dashboard elements, ventilation systems, and even end-use parts. Additionally, SLS is instrumental in producing custom jigs and fixtures for automotive assembly lines, enhancing manufacturing efficiency and flexibility.

Breaking Down the Budget: The Cost and Reach of SLS Technology

Selective laser sintering technology has evolved considerably over the years, in terms of technological advancements, and more importantly in its cost dynamics and accessibility. Understanding the financial aspects of SLS is crucial for businesses considering its adoption.

1. Initial Investment in SLS Technology:

Historically, the cost of high-quality SLS printers has been a significant barrier for small businesses and individual users. These printers, known for their precision and ability to handle complex designs, were primarily accessible to larger companies with substantial budgets.
The initial investment goes beyond the printer’s price, encompassing the cost of materials, maintenance, and necessary post-processing equipment. These factors collectively contribute to the overall expense of incorporating SLS technology into a production line.

2. Material Costs and Efficiency:

The materials used in SLS, mainly various polymers and metals, are relatively cost-effective compared to materials used in other additive manufacturing processes. The efficiency of material usage in SLS, where unused powder can be recycled and reused, also adds to its cost-effectiveness.
Despite the efficiency in material use, the cost of specialized materials like high-performance polymers and metals can still be substantial, impacting the overall cost of SLS printing.

3. Trends in the Cost of SLS:

In recent years, there has been a notable trend toward making SLS technology more accessible. Advancements in technology and increased competition have led to a decrease in the cost of SLS printers, making them more attainable for medium-sized businesses and specialized small-scale manufacturers.
The trend is also evident in the emergence of smaller, more affordable SLS printers designed for specific applications, offering a more cost-effective entry point for businesses looking to leverage SLS technology.

4. Accessibility to Businesses:

The decreasing cost of SLS printers, combined with their efficiency and the broad range of applications they support, has made SLS technology more accessible than ever before. Businesses across various industries are now able to integrate SLS into their manufacturing processes, benefiting from its precision, material efficiency, and design flexibility.
The future of SLS seems geared towards even greater accessibility, with continuous improvements in printer technology, material science, and cost reduction strategies.

Laser sintering technology, in terms of cost and accessibility, reflects its growing importance in the additive manufacturing world. As the tech becomes more affordable and efficient, it opens up new opportunities for innovation and production across a diverse range of industries.

How has the cost of SLS technology changed over the years?

Over the years, the cost of SLS technology has significantly decreased, making it more accessible to a wider range of businesses. Technological advancements and increased competition have led to more affordable SLS printers, particularly for medium-sized and specialized small-scale manufacturers.

What factors contribute to the overall cost of implementing SLS in a business?

The overall cost of implementing SLS includes the initial investment in the printer, material costs, maintenance expenses, and necessary post-processing equipment. While SLS printers have become more affordable, the specialized materials and maintenance can still contribute to a substantial overall cost.

Is SLS technology becoming more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses?

Yes, SLS technology is increasingly becoming more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses. The trend towards smaller, more affordable SLS printers, along with their efficiency and broad application range, has opened up opportunities for these businesses to adopt SLS for various innovative applications.

Charting the Future of Laser Sintering

The tech that powers selective laser sintering is continually evolving, driven by relentless innovation and the pursuit of higher efficiency, precision, and versatility. As we look towards the future, several trends and developments stand poised to redefine the landscape of SLS technology, pushing the boundaries of what’s achievable in additive manufacturing.

1. Enhanced Material Capabilities:

Future advancements in SLS are expected to focus significantly on expanding material capabilities. This includes the development of new polymers and composite materials, offering enhanced properties such as higher heat resistance, improved strength-to-weight ratios, and greater flexibility. This expansion will broaden the scope of SLS applications, particularly in sectors demanding specialized material properties.

2. Increased Precision and Speed:

Advancements in laser technology and sintering processes are anticipated to yield higher precision and faster printing speeds. These improvements will not only enhance the quality of the final products but also significantly reduce production times, making SLS more viable for large-scale manufacturing and just-in-time production models.

3. Greater Customization and Complexity:

SLS is expected to push the envelope in terms of design complexity and customization capabilities. With improvements in software algorithms and scanning technology, SLS could offer even more intricate detailing and customization options, particularly in industries like healthcare for patient-specific implants and prosthetics.

4. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Practices:

As environmental concerns gain prominence, future SLS development is likely to emphasize sustainability. This could involve optimizing material usage, enhancing powder recyclability, and reducing energy consumption, aligning SLS technology with eco-friendly manufacturing practices.

5. Accessibility and Cost Reduction:

The trend towards making SLS more accessible and cost-effective is likely to continue. This will involve the development of more compact, user-friendly SLS printers, suitable for smaller businesses and educational settings, along with efforts to further reduce the cost of SLS materials and equipment.

What material advancements can we expect in the future of SLS?

Future SLS developments are expected to introduce new polymers and composite materials, enhancing properties like heat resistance, strength, and flexibility. These advancements will open up new applications, particularly in industries that demand specialized material properties.

How will advancements in SLS technology impact its precision and speed?

Upcoming innovations in laser technology and sintering processes are poised to significantly enhance the precision and speed of SLS printing. This will not only improve the quality of the end products but will also drastically cut down on production times, making SLS a more viable option for large-scale manufacturing.

In what ways is SLS expected to become more sustainable and eco-friendly?

The future of SLS will likely focus more on sustainability. Efforts may include enhancing powder recyclability, reducing energy consumption, and optimizing material usage. These steps will align SLS technology with eco-friendly manufacturing practices, addressing growing environmental concerns.

As we’ve explored laser sintering, it’s evident that this technology has cemented its place as a cornerstone in the world of rapid prototyping and manufacturing. SLS has transformed the way objects are conceived and redefined the boundaries of design and production.

SLS stands out for its ability to merge precision, efficiency, and versatility. It has empowered designers and engineers to break free from the constraints of traditional manufacturing methods, fostering innovation and creativity. From complex aerospace components to intricate medical devices and robust automotive parts, SLS has proven its worth across a wide spectrum of industries.

Looking ahead, the potential and growth of SLS technology seem boundless. With ongoing advancements in materials, precision, and sustainability, SLS is set to expand its influence even further. Its evolution towards greater accessibility and cost-effectiveness will likely democratize high-quality manufacturing, making it available to a broader range of businesses and individuals.

As SLS continues to evolve, it promises to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of additive manufacturing. By pushing the limits of what’s possible today, SLS is paving the way for a tomorrow where complex, high-quality, and sustainable production is not just an aspiration but a reality. The journey of SLS, from a niche technology to a mainstream manufacturing solution, is a testament to the relentless pursuit of innovation and excellence in the world of 3D printing.

See Our Other Related Articles:

Stereolithography: SLA 3DP

SLA 3DP

Digital Light Processing: DLP 3DP

DLP 3DP

3D Printing

3DP General

FDM 3DP

SLA 3DP

DLP 3DP

EBM 3DP

SLM 3DP

DMLS 3DP

PLA vs ABS

Beginners Guide 3DP

Best Beginner 3D Printer

Troubleshooting 3DP

3D Printer Reviews

Airbrush 3D Prints

3DP Anime Figures

3DP Laser Cutter Engraver

Elegoo Phecda Review

Laser Cutting Engraving